(The) impacts of preferential tariff and rules of origin on trade diversion - under the China-South Korea FTA
000 | 00000nam c2200205 c 4500 | |
001 | 000046126962 | |
005 | 20230717103345 | |
007 | ta | |
008 | 220628s2022 ulkd bmAC 000c eng | |
040 | ▼a 211009 ▼c 211009 ▼d 211009 | |
085 | 0 | ▼a 0510 ▼2 KDCP |
090 | ▼a 0510 ▼b 6X6 ▼c 1929 | |
100 | 1 | ▼a Wang, Congrong |
245 | 1 1 | ▼a (The) impacts of preferential tariff and rules of origin on trade diversion - under the China-South Korea FTA / ▼d Wang, Congrong |
260 | ▼a Seoul : ▼b Graduate School of International Studies, Korea University, ▼c 2022 | |
300 | ▼a iv, 2, 61장 : ▼b 도표 ; ▼c 26 cm | |
500 | ▼a 지도교수: 박인원 | |
502 | 0 | ▼a 학위논문(석사)-- ▼b 고려대학교 국제대학원, ▼c 국제학과, ▼d 2022. 8 |
504 | ▼a 참고문헌: 장 56-61 | |
530 | ▼a PDF 파일로도 이용가능; ▼c Requires PDF file reader(application/pdf) | |
653 | ▼a Product-specific Rules of origin ▼a Preferential Tariff ▼a Trade Diversion ▼a The China-South Korea FTA | |
776 | 0 | ▼t The Impacts of Preferential Tariff and Rules of Origin on Trade Diversion - under the China-South Korea FTA ▼w (DCOLL211009)000000268751 |
900 | 1 0 | ▼a 박인원, ▼g 朴仁元, ▼d 1959-, ▼e 지도교수 ▼0 AUTH(211009)16476 |
900 | 1 0 | ▼a Park, Innwon, ▼e 지도교수 |
945 | ▼a ITMT |
전자정보
소장정보
No. | 소장처 | 청구기호 | 등록번호 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. 1 | 소장처 학술정보관(CDL)/B1 국제기구자료실(학위논문)/ | 청구기호 0510 6X6 1929 | 등록번호 163082892 | 도서상태 대출가능 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
No. 2 | 소장처 학술정보관(CDL)/B1 국제기구자료실(학위논문)/ | 청구기호 0510 6X6 1929 | 등록번호 163082893 | 도서상태 대출가능 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
컨텐츠정보
초록
Preferential tariff policy and rules of origin are important topics for countries when negotiating on FTAs. The tariff liberalization leads to an increase in trade among member countries and a decrease in trade between member and non-member countries, while rules of origin inhibit the impact of preferential tariffs on trade. Several empirical studies verified that preferential tariff policy leads to trade creation, but some studies proved that preferential tariff policy diverts trade from non-members to members. Therefore, this thesis attempts to explore whether the preferential tariff policy of the China-South Korea FTA caused trade diversion based on the model firstly proposed by Romalis (2007). After finding the trade diversion caused by tariff reduction, the paper calculates the amount of trade diversion caused by the preferential tariff for each year, according to the method by Russ and Swenson (2019). In addition, this paper will also consider the effect of rules of origin on trade diversion by quantifying product-specific rules of origin. This paper will use import data and tariff data at a product-country-year level and the gravity model proposed by Romalis to investigate the relationship between the changes in China's imports from the 17 countries in the sample and the preferential tariffs of the China-South Korea FTA during the 2013-2019, as well as the relationship between rules of origin and the change in the imports. The empirical results show that each 1% reduction in the China-South Korea tariffs is associated with a 0.055% decrease in China's imports from other countries relative to Japan's imports from other countries. Moreover, the import diversion caused by the preferential tariffs decreases by 0.049% for each 1-unit increase in the RoO restrictiveness index.
목차
I. Introduction 1 1.1 Research Background and Significance 1 1.2 Research Questions 3 1.3 Structure of the paper 5 II. Literature Reviews 7 2.1 Trade Creation and Trade Diversion 7 2.2 Rules of Origin (RoO) 10 III. Overview of China-South Korea Trade 14 3.1 Statistical Observation 14 3.2 the China-South Korea FTA 23 IV. Rules of Origin Provision in the China-South Korea FTA 26 4.1 Status of the RoO 26 4.2 Features of the RoO 29 4.3 Restrictiveness of the RoO 34 V. Quantitative Analysis of the Trade Diversion Effect of Tariff Liberalization and RoO in the China-South Korea FTA 38 5.1 Empirical Model 38 5.2 Data 41 5.2.1 Reference country 41 5.2.2 Variables 42 5.3 Empirical Analysis 43 5.4 Robust Test and Result 47 5.4.1 Remove the year 2017 from the empirical model 47 5.4.2 Remove Australia from the empirical model 48 5.4.3 Remove the products which apply ‘wholly obtained’ product-specific rules of origin 48 5.5 Trade Diversion Estimates 49 VI. Conclusion and Implication 52