
The horizontal effect of fundamental rights in the European Union : a constitutional analysis / First Edition
000 | 00000cam u2200205 a 4500 | |
001 | 000046075250 | |
005 | 20210329162258 | |
008 | 210326s2019 enk b 001 0 eng c | |
010 | ▼a 2018957180 | |
015 | ▼a GBB918995 ▼2 bnb | |
020 | ▼a 9780198837152 (hardback) | |
035 | ▼a (KERIS)REF000019024210 | |
040 | ▼a YDX ▼b eng ▼c YDX ▼e rda ▼d BDX ▼d OCLCQ ▼d ERASA ▼d UKMGB ▼d OCLCO ▼d LSD ▼d BUB ▼d OCLCF ▼d QGE ▼d QGK ▼d GUL ▼d DLC ▼d 211009 | |
042 | ▼a pcc | |
043 | ▼a e------ | |
050 | 0 0 | ▼a KJE5132 ▼b .F73 2019 |
082 | 0 4 | ▼a 341.48 ▼2 23 |
084 | ▼a 341.48 ▼2 DDCK | |
090 | ▼a 341.48 ▼b F836h | |
100 | 1 | ▼a Frantziou, Eleni, ▼e author. |
245 | 1 4 | ▼a The horizontal effect of fundamental rights in the European Union : ▼b a constitutional analysis / ▼c Eleni Frantziou. |
250 | ▼a First Edition. | |
260 | ▼a Oxford, United Kingdom : ▼b Oxford University Press, ▼c 2019. | |
264 | 1 | ▼a Oxford, United Kingdom : ▼b Oxford University Press, ▼c 2019. |
300 | ▼a xxiii, 231 p. ; ▼c 25 cm. | |
336 | ▼a text ▼b txt ▼2 rdacontent | |
337 | ▼a unmediated ▼b n ▼2 rdamedia | |
338 | ▼a volume ▼b nc ▼2 rdacarrier | |
490 | 1 | ▼a Oxford studies in European law |
504 | ▼a Includes bibliographical references and index. | |
520 | 8 | ▼a This book analyses the horizontal effect of fundamental rights in the European Union, from a constitutional perspective. It advances two main arguments: First, it argues that the horizontal effect of fundamental rights (i.e. their application to disputes between private parties) cannot be usefully discussed based on the existing EU horizontality doctrine, which associates horizontality with the exercise of horizontal direct effect only. That doctrine is characterised by a series of overly technical rules as to how the latter may be produced and has a case-specific nature that lacks overall constitutional coherence. Secondly, the book argues that a substantive theory of horizontality is required in EU law and sketches its main parameters. In the fundamental rights context, horizontal effect has organisational implications for society, which go beyond specific intersubjective disputes. It is argued that its determination requires an explicit recognition of the public character of certain private platforms of will formation (e.g. the workplace) and a discussion of the role of fundamental rights therein. At the same time, a constitutionally adequate model of horizontality involves an acknowledgment of the supranational character of EU adjudication: the determination of horizontal applicability of a fundamental right within a type of private authority relationship falls upon the Court of Justice, but the precise manifestation of horizontal effect (e.g. direct, indirect or state-mediated effect) rests with national courts. |
650 | 0 | ▼a Civil rights ▼z European Union countries. |
650 | 7 | ▼a Civil rights. ▼2 fast. |
651 | 7 | ▼a Europe ▼z European Union countries. ▼2 fast. |
830 | 0 | ▼a Oxford studies in European law. |
945 | ▼a KLPA |
소장정보
No. | 소장처 | 청구기호 | 등록번호 | 도서상태 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. 1 | 소장처 중앙도서관/법학도서실(법학도서관 지하1층)/ | 청구기호 341.48 F836h | 등록번호 111846489 | 도서상태 대출가능 | 반납예정일 | 예약 | 서비스 |
컨텐츠정보
목차
Abstract Acknowledgements Table of Contents Introduction PART I - The Constitutional Foundations of Horizontality 1: The Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights as a Constitutional Problem 2: The Constitutional Operation of Horizontality PART II - The Horizontal Effect of Fundamental Rights in EU Law 3: From Defrenne to the Charter: Understanding the EU Horizontality Heritage 4: Horizontal Effect after the Entry into Force of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights 5: Horizontal Effect and the Hybrid Constitutional Structure of EU Law PART III - A Theory of Horizontality for Fundamental Rights in the EU 6: Rediscovering Supranational Constitutional Reasoning in the Interpretation of Horizontality 7: A Justification for Horizontality: Political Equality 8: The Application of a Constitutional Theory of Horizontality in EU Fundamental Rights Law: Two Clarifications and a Question Conclusion