HOME > 상세정보

상세정보

Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa

Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa (2회 대출)

자료유형
단행본
개인저자
Petersen, Niels.
서명 / 저자사항
Proportionality and judicial activism : fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / Niels Petersen.
발행사항
Cambridge, United Kingdom ;   New York, NY, USA :   Cambridge University Press,   2017   (2018 printing).  
형태사항
x, 249 p. ; 23 cm.
ISBN
9781107177987 (hardback) 9781316630822 (pbk.)
요약
"The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"--
일반주기
Based on author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten.  
내용주기
Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality.
서지주기
Includes bibliographical references (p. 211-240) and index.
일반주제명
Political questions and judicial power --Canada. Political questions and judicial power --Germany. Political questions and judicial power --South Africa. Proportionality in law --Canada. Proportionality in law --Germany. Proportionality in law --South Africa. Court of last resort --Canada. Court of last resort --Germany. Court of last resort --South Africa.
000 00000cam u2200205 a 4500
001 000045982145
005 20190430112558
008 190429s2017 enk b 001 0 eng
010 ▼a 2016058544
020 ▼a 9781107177987 (hardback)
020 ▼a 9781316630822 (pbk.)
035 ▼a (KERIS)REF000018246278
040 ▼a DLC ▼b eng ▼c DLC ▼e rda ▼d 211009
043 ▼a n-cn--- ▼a e-gx--- ▼a f-sa---
050 0 0 ▼a K3367 ▼b .P48 2017
082 0 0 ▼a 342.08/5 ▼2 23
084 ▼a 342.085 ▼2 DDCK
090 ▼a 342.085 ▼b P484p
100 1 ▼a Petersen, Niels.
245 1 0 ▼a Proportionality and judicial activism : ▼b fundamental rights adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa / ▼c Niels Petersen.
260 ▼a Cambridge, United Kingdom ; ▼a New York, NY, USA : ▼b Cambridge University Press, ▼c 2017 ▼g (2018 printing).
300 ▼a x, 249 p. ; ▼c 23 cm.
500 ▼a Based on author's thesis (Habilitation - Universität, Bonn, 2012) issued under title: Verhältnismässigkeit als Rationalitätskontrolle : eine rechtsempirische Studie verfassungsrechtlicher Rechtsprechung zu den Freiheitsgrundrechten.
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references (p. 211-240) and index.
505 8 ▼a Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality.
520 ▼a "The principle of proportionality is currently one of the most discussed topics in the field of comparative constitutional law. Many critics claim that courts use the proportionality test as an instrument of judicial self-empowerment. Proportionality and Judicial Activism tests this hypothesis empirically; it systematically and comparatively analyses the fundamental rights jurisprudence of the Canadian Supreme Court, the German Federal Constitutional Court and the South African Constitutional Court. The book shows that the proportionality test does give judges a considerable amount of discretion. However, this analytical openness does not necessarily lead to judicial activism. Instead, judges are faced with significant institutional constraints, as a result of which all three examined courts refrain from using proportionality for purposes of judicial activism"-- ▼c Provided by publisher.
650 0 ▼a Political questions and judicial power ▼z Canada.
650 0 ▼a Political questions and judicial power ▼z Germany.
650 0 ▼a Political questions and judicial power ▼z South Africa.
650 0 ▼a Proportionality in law ▼z Canada.
650 0 ▼a Proportionality in law ▼z Germany.
650 0 ▼a Proportionality in law ▼z South Africa.
650 0 ▼a Court of last resort ▼z Canada.
650 0 ▼a Court of last resort ▼z Germany.
650 0 ▼a Court of last resort ▼z South Africa.
945 ▼a KLPA

소장정보

No. 소장처 청구기호 등록번호 도서상태 반납예정일 예약 서비스
No. 1 소장처 중앙도서관/법학도서실(법학도서관 지하1층)/ 청구기호 342.085 P484p 등록번호 111808662 도서상태 대출가능 반납예정일 예약 서비스 B M

컨텐츠정보

목차

Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. Judicial review and the correction of political market failures; 2. The normative debate on balancing; 3. Balancing and judicial legitimacy; 4. Proportionality as a doctrinal construction; 5. The avoidance of balancing; 6. Rationalising balancing; Conclusion: proportionality and the review of legislative rationality.

관련분야 신착자료