HOME > 상세정보

상세정보

미국의 고용상 연령차별금지법제

미국의 고용상 연령차별금지법제

자료유형
단행본
개인저자
김지영, 연구책임
단체저자명
한국. 헌법재판소. 헌법재판연구원
서명 / 저자사항
미국의 고용상 연령차별금지법제 / 헌법재판소 헌법재판연구원 [편]
발행사항
서울 :   헌법재판소 헌법재판연구원,   2016  
형태사항
iii, 81 p. ; 26 cm
총서사항
비교헌법연구 ;2016-B-2
일반주기
연구책임: 김지영  
서지주기
참고문헌: p. 77-81
000 00000nam c2200205 c 4500
001 000045864663
005 20160420132918
007 ta
008 160310s2016 ulk b 000c korYA
040 ▼a 211009 ▼c 211009 ▼d 211009
074 ▼k 33-9750040-000092-01
082 0 4 ▼a 342 ▼2 23
085 ▼a 342 ▼2 DDCK
090 ▼a 342 ▼b 2016z1 ▼c 2016.B.2
110 ▼a 한국. ▼b 헌법재판소. ▼b 헌법재판연구원
245 1 0 ▼a 미국의 고용상 연령차별금지법제 / ▼d 헌법재판소 헌법재판연구원 [편]
260 ▼a 서울 : ▼b 헌법재판소 헌법재판연구원, ▼c 2016
300 ▼a iii, 81 p. ; ▼c 26 cm
440 0 0 ▼a 비교헌법연구 ; ▼v 2016-B-2
500 ▼a 연구책임: 김지영
504 ▼a 참고문헌: p. 77-81
700 1 ▼a 김지영, ▼e 연구책임
945 ▼a KLPA

소장정보

No. 소장처 청구기호 등록번호 도서상태 반납예정일 예약 서비스
No. 1 소장처 중앙도서관/법학도서실(법학도서관 지하1층)/ 청구기호 342 2016z1 2016.B.2 등록번호 111752841 도서상태 대출가능 반납예정일 예약 서비스 B M
No. 2 소장처 중앙도서관/법학도서실(법학도서관 지하1층)/ 청구기호 342 2016z1 2016.B.2 등록번호 111752842 도서상태 대출가능 반납예정일 예약 서비스 B M

컨텐츠정보

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론 / 1
1. 연구의 의의 및 필요성 ······················································································· 1
2. 연구의 범위 및 구성 ··························································································· 3
Ⅱ. 연령차별의 개념과 영역 / 5
1. 연령차별의 특성 및 개념 ··················································································· 5
가. 연령의 특수성 ······························································································· 5
나. 차별의 개념 및 유형 ···················································································· 6
(1) 직접차별 ·································································································· 7
(2) 간접차별 ·································································································· 7
다. 연령차별의 개념 ·························································································· 10
라. 연령차별의 특징 ·························································································· 11
2. 연령제한이 발생하는 영역과 연령차별금지에 관한 법제 ···························· 12
Ⅲ. 미국 헌법상 연령차별 논의 / 17
1. 연령차별금지에 관한 헌법적 근거 ·································································· 17
2. 헌법상 평등보호원칙 위반 여부에 관한 미연방대법원 판례 ······················ 17
가. 정년규정에 대한 미 연방대법원의 평등심사 ·········································· 18
(1) 주경찰 정년을 50세로 정한 법률의 위헌 여부 ································ 18
(2) 연방 외무직공무원 정년 규정의 위헌 여부 ······································ 20
(3) 주법원 법관의 정년을 정한 주헌법조항의 연방헌법 위배 여부 ···· 24
나. 연령차별에 대한 헌법적 논의의 쇠퇴 ······················································ 26
3. 연령차별에 관한 위헌심사기준 ········································································ 27
가. 미연방대법원의 심사기준 및 근거 ··························································· 27
나. 심사기준 강화에 대한 논의 ······································································· 29
다. 검토 및 전망 ······························································································· 32
Ⅳ. 고용상 연령차별금지법(ADEA)의 내용과 실제 / 38
1. 서설 ····················································································································· 38
2. 고용상 연령차별금지법(ADEA) 도입의 시대적 배경 ···································· 38
3. 주요 내용 ············································································································ 40
가. 입법배경 및 목적 ························································································ 40
나. 보호대상 ······································································································· 41
다. 적용대상 및 금지행위 ················································································ 43
라. 연령차별의 예외적 허용 ············································································ 44
(1) 진정 직업자격(bona fide occupational qualification) ··························· 45
(2) 연령 이외에 합리적 요인(reasonable factor other than age) ············· 45
(3) 해외사업장 현지법 저촉 ······································································ 46
(4) 진정 선임권제도(bona fide seniority) ·················································· 46
(5) 진정 근로자급부제도(bona fide employee benefit plan) ···················· 47
(6) 정당한 사유에 기한 해고․징계 ························································· 48
마. 금지되는 차별유형 ······················································································ 48
바. 차별 구제 ····································································································· 49
(1) 구제절차 ································································································· 49
(2) 구제내용 ································································································· 50
4. 고용상 연령차별금지법(ADEA) 해석에 관한 미연방대법원 판례 ··············· 51
가. 보호대상간 차별 ·························································································· 51
나. 의도적인 차별대우(직접차별) ···································································· 52
다. 차별적 영향(간접차별) ················································································ 53
5. 검토 및 정리 ······································································································ 57
Ⅴ. 결 론 / 65
❚참고문헌 ······················································································································· 77

관련분야 신착자료

하명호 (2022)
Sachs, Michael (2021)
한수웅 (2021)
한국. 중앙선거관리위원회. 선거연수원 (2021)