| 000 | 01724camuu2200337 a 4500 | |
| 001 | 000045671499 | |
| 005 | 20111013094606 | |
| 008 | 111012s2007 nyua b 001 0 eng d | |
| 010 | ▼a 2007018740 | |
| 020 | ▼a 9780521877190 (hardback) | |
| 020 | ▼a 0521877199 (hardback) | |
| 035 | ▼a (KERIS)REF000013088931 | |
| 040 | ▼a DLC ▼c DLC ▼d YDX ▼d BAKER ▼d BTCTA ▼d YDXCP ▼d DLC ▼d 211009 | |
| 043 | ▼a n-mx--- | |
| 050 | 0 0 | ▼a JF2051 ▼b .G745 2007 |
| 082 | 0 0 | ▼a 324.2 ▼2 22 |
| 084 | ▼a 324.2 ▼2 DDCK | |
| 090 | ▼a 324.2 ▼b G811w | |
| 100 | 1 | ▼a Greene, Kenneth F., ▼d 1969-. |
| 245 | 1 0 | ▼a Why dominant parties lose : ▼b Mexico's democratization in comparative perspective / ▼c Kenneth F. Greene. |
| 260 | ▼a Cambridge ▼a New York : ▼b Cambridge University Press, ▼c 2007. | |
| 300 | ▼a xvi, 350 p. : ▼b ill. ; ▼c 24 cm. | |
| 504 | ▼a Includes bibliographical references (p. 311-331) and index. | |
| 505 | 0 | ▼a Introduction: The puzzle of single-party dominance -- A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development -- Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s-1990s -- Why participate? : a theory of elite activism in dominant party systems -- The empirical dynamics of elite activism -- Constrained to the core : opposition party organizations, 1980s-1990s -- Dominance defeated : voting behavior in the 2000 elections -- Extending the argument : Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan -- Conclusions and implications. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a One-party systems. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Opposition (Political science) |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Democratization ▼z Mexico. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Presidents ▼z Mexico ▼x Election ▼y 2000. |
| 650 | 0 | ▼a Comparative government. |
| 945 | ▼a KLPA |
Holdings Information
| No. | Location | Call Number | Accession No. | Availability | Due Date | Make a Reservation | Service |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. 1 | Location Main Library/Western Books/ | Call Number 324.2 G811w | Accession No. 111644757 | Availability Available | Due Date | Make a Reservation | Service |
Contents information
Table of Contents
Part I. The Macro Perspective: 1. A theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development; 2. Dominant party advantages and opposition party failure, 1930s?90s; Part II. The Micro Perspective: 3. Why participate? A theory of elite activism in dominant party systems; 4. The empirical dynamics of elite activism; Part III. Implications: 5. Constrained to the core: opposition party organizations, 1980s?90s; 6. Dominance defeated: voting behavior in the 2000 elections; 7. Extending the argument: Italy, Japan, Malaysia, and Taiwan.
Information Provided By: :
