Detail View

목차
머리말 = 3
추천사 = 7
Chapter One : Introduction
 1. Introduction = 13
 2. The Purpose of Comparisons = 17
 3. Framework of Analysis and Methodology = 31
Chapter Two : Theoretical Background
 1. Introduction = 47
 2. Foreign Policy-making Models = 50
  2.1. Traditional Viewpoints on Foreign Policy-making = 50
  2.2. Decision-Making Approach = 54
  2.3. Pluralist Viewpoints on Foreign Policy-Making = 57
  2.4. Foreign Policy-Making of Small States = 70
 3. Systems Perspective : analytical framework = 83
Chapter Three : The American Case
 1. Introduction = 87
 2. Foreign policy process = 90
 3. Why does Congress want to control foreign policy? = 107
 4. How does Congess control foreign policy in practice? = 114
 5. What is the degree of Congressional influence in foreign policy? = 122
 6. What is the outcome of Congressional control for the effectiveness of U.S. foreign policy? = 137
Chapter Four : The British Case
 1. Introduction = 147
 2. Foreign policy-making process and Parliament = 149
 3. What is the degree of Parliamentary influence in foreign policy? = 171
 4. Why does Parliament want to control foreign policy? = 180
 5. How does Parliament control foreign policy? = 188
 6. What is the outcome of Parliamentary control for the effectiveness of U.K. foreign policy? = 195
Chapter Five : The Korean Foreign Policy Process
 1. Introduction = 205
 2. The Constitution and Participants in the foreign Policy Process = 206
 3. Increased Opportunity for the Involvement of the National Assembly in the Foreign Policy Process = 234
 4. The National Assembly and Foreign Policy in Practice = 244
 5. Conclusion = 260
Chapter Six : The Korean Case
 1. Introduction = 263
 2. What is the degee of the National Assembly's influence on foreign policy? = 264
 3. Why does the NA want to control foreign policy = 309
 4. How does the NA control foreign policy? = 320
 5. What is the outcome of the NA's control for the effectiveness of ROK foreign policy? = 324
Chapter Seven : Conclusion
 1. Comparison = 331
 2. Theoretical implication = 335
 3. The importance of an institutional perspective for the development of the Korean case = 338
 4. The circumstances of Korea in the 2000s = 347
 5. Implications of the American and British cases for the development of the Korean case = 355
  From the American case = 355
  From the British case = 367
Bibliography = 385
Index = 412